writes
<snip>
Post by bananaI know little about 'Revelations'. I've read it, but couldn't keep up in
a discussion of details in it.
Then why post all this nonsense about Ronald Ray-Gun and 666 if you have no
real knowledge of the details of it.
Uh? I haven't posted anything about any details in 'Revelations'.
Post by bananaI'd agree with Isaac Newton, John Napier,
and many others, that it can be usefully studied. I know sufficient
though to state that the idea that the number refers to Nero Caesar and
only to Nero Caesar is complete hooey - as anyone with the slightest
acquaintance with gematria will agree. (Perhaps few hold this idea, but
I did hear it expressed several years ago by someone).
I don't hold with the view that Nero Caesar was the ONLY person who can be
indentified with "The Beast", but I think you must agree that he is ONE of
the strong contenders, being as his name in Greek is Neron Kaiser, which,
I'm led to believe, translates exactly into 666 when translated into Hebrew.
I agree that he was very probably one of the references, but when you
say 'one of the strong contenders', you are missing the fact that
gematria involves multiple references from the same numerical value.
I was more interested in the fact that you think that something written by a
guy who had a dream in a cave some 2000 years ago could have an affect on a
person living today, and all that that train of thought implies.
I didn't say that. Goodness knows what your view of causality is...
It would
also mean that you believe in pre-destiny, and in the existence of some
supreme being, and, of course, the existence of the Devil. Do you also
believe in fairies at the bottom of your garden?
Do you think the world entered the light when 'Revelations' specialist
Isaac Newton wrote 'Principia' or was it when those evil nutters
developed the atom bomb?
Post by bananaIs the way the code marks out '666' (with all respect to the point that
four '0' bits are missing) simply an accident? I would say that by far
the most reasonable answer is 'no'.
You seem to have an interest in maths-and if you fully understood the
implications of the "guard bars", and their actual use, could you suggest
another way? The thickness of the lines has to be calculated by the
reading machine, so Bar-Space-Bar is, to my way of thinking, the incredibly
obvious way of doing it. We've discussed this before many years ago in this
forum, and I'm glad you have at last admitted that the "guard bars" cannot
actually be read as "666", but can only be implied to read as such, if the
reader is allowed to use a fair bit of "poetic licence".
My position is the same as it was then. You can call it 'poetic licence'
but what it really is is looking at MEANING, and the manipulation of
meaning. It isn't 'cutting corners' off of the 'straight and narrow'
road of some silly objectivist science (which is a deliberately
manipulated ideology, in which functionaries are initiated only to
certain levels, as in any other cult). To answer your question, the 101
sequence (as used with 0 or empty spaces on both sides), which is
contained within the code only for a single number, 6, could equally
well be contained within one or more of the other digits, but isn't.
Also the central guard bar would not have to be the same as the two end
guard bars. One could easily write loads of different, equally useful
coding systems that did not yield '666' in this way, or in any other
such simple way.
Post by bananaPS Any idea about the LSD 6/6/1966 thing?
I only know that LSD was banned in 1966, but not the precise date. 6th June
1966 was a Monday, so it is possible. However, I have a few misgivings
about the whole thing, for a start 6/6/66 is four sixes, and not 3, so is
irrelevant to a conversation concerning Revelations, but putting this aside
for one minute, surely you must look at everything that happened on this
day, before trying to find a causual relationship between LSD and 666, when
one might not exist at all.
If the ban was on 6/6/66 then there would be a link between LSD and 6,
and using base 10 there is a link between 6 and 666.
In many countries in festivals or at election time or whatever,
particular numbers are bigged up, along with particular colours or other
symbols, or as with Cory Aquino, Winston Churchill, and Russian
Orthodoxy, particular hand signals. When are esoteric meanings not used?
Maybe the ban was imposed on that day as a little joke by MI6, knowing
the ban would either help their funding, give them some other lever, or
both? :-)
--
banana "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you
give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to
Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the
rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)